Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respir Med ; 171: 106079, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As-needed budesonide/formoterol is effective in patients with mild asthma for whom low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy is appropriate. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of this regimen versus maintenance low-dose ICS plus as-needed short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA). METHODS: A probabilistic Markov cohort model was developed that simulated time within/outside severe asthma exacerbations, conducted from a UK NHS perspective with a 70-year time horizon. Clinical efficacy inputs were derived from the SYGMA 2 trial. Patients with mild asthma eligible for low-dose maintenance ICS therapy received as-needed budesonide/formoterol 200/6 µg or twice-daily budesonide 200 µg maintenance therapy plus as-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg. A severe exacerbation was defined as worsening asthma requiring systemic corticosteroid use alone/in combination with an emergency department visit, or hospitalisation for acute asthma. Utility values were derived from SYGMA 2 EQ-5D-5L data, and all-cause- and asthma-related mortality, reduction in utility of an exacerbation, and costs were based on published data. The base-case analysis discount rate was 3.5%. Model robustness was evaluated with one-way sensitivity, probabilistic sensitivity, and two scenario analyses. RESULTS: On average, as-needed budesonide/formoterol was associated with a £292.99 cost saving and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains of 0.001 versus ICS + SABA. At a willingness-to-pay of £20,000/QALY, as-needed budesonide/formoterol had >85% probability of being cost-effective versus ICS + SABA. Key drivers were budesonide/formoterol and budesonide maintenance annual exacerbation rates, mean daily budesonide/formoterol inhalations, and costs and outcomes discount rates. CONCLUSIONS: From a UK healthcare payer perspective, as-needed budesonide/formoterol is a cost-effective option for the treatment of mild asthma versus regular ICS.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/economía , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/economía , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/economía , Combinación Budesonida y Fumarato de Formoterol/administración & dosificación , Combinación Budesonida y Fumarato de Formoterol/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Quimioterapia de Mantención/economía , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
2.
Adv Ther ; 37(10): 4190-4208, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720299

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with asthma typically increase short-acting ß2-agonists (SABA) use with worsening symptoms. Excessive SABA use may lead to a higher risk of adverse outcomes. We evaluated, in a large population cohort, an association between SABA inhaler use and asthma exacerbations and healthcare utilization. METHODS: As part of the SABINA (SABA use IN Asthma) global program, we conducted a retrospective longitudinal observational study (SABINA I) using UK primary care electronic healthcare records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink; 2007-2017) from asthma patients aged ≥ 12 years. SABA inhaler use was classified as 'high use', ≥ 3 canisters/year versus 'low use', 0-2 canisters/year. Taking into consideration all their asthma prescriptions, patients were categorized into a treatment step according to 2016 British Thoracic Society (BTS) asthma management guidelines. Multivariable regression assessed the association of SABA inhaler use by BTS treatment steps (grouped as BTS steps 1/2 and 3-5), separately, and with outcomes of exacerbations or asthma-related healthcare utilization (primary care and hospital outpatient consultations); only patients with linked hospital data were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Of the 574,913 patients included, 218,365 (38%) had high SABA inhaler use. Overall, 336,412 patients had linked hospital data. High SABA inhaler use was significantly associated with an increased risk of exacerbations [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI): BTS steps 1/2 = 1.20, 1.16-1.24; BTS steps 3-5 = 1.24, 1.20-1.28], asthma-related primary care consultations [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR), 95% CI: BTS steps 1/2 = 1.24, 1.23-1.26; BTS steps 3-5 = 1.13, 1.11-1.15], and asthma-related hospital outpatient consultations (adjusted IRR, 95% CI: BTS steps 1/2 = 1.19, 1.12-1.27; BTS steps 3-5 = 1.19, 1.13-1.26). CONCLUSION: High SABA inhaler use was frequent across BTS steps and was associated with a significant increase in exacerbations and asthma-related healthcare utilization.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...